next up previous
Next: Hill's Method solution Up: Mathieu's Equation, solution, and Previous: Mathieu's Equation, solution, and

Basics and Flouqent's Theorem

Our derivation below can be found in greater detail and better form in many references [3,4,5], and our derivation follows the spirit of these. An equation such as Mathieu's equation,

$\displaystyle \ddot{\eta}+(a-2q\cos(2\tau))\eta=0$ (2.1)

is of a class of differential equations of the type [7],

$\displaystyle L[y]=y''+p(t)y' + q(t)y = 0$ (2.2)

Any two fundamental solutions to this equation, $ y_1(t), y_2(t)$ , will satisfy the set of boundary value equations,

$\displaystyle \left. \begin{array}{lll}
c_1y_1(t_0) + c_2 y_2(t_0)&=&y_0 \\
c_1y'_1(t_0) + c_2y'_2(t_0)&=&y'_0
\end{array}\right\}  Y{\bf c}={\bf y}
$

We thus require that the determinant of Y (called the Wronskian) is not equal to zero,

$\displaystyle W(Y)=det(Y)=\left\vert\begin{array}{cc}y_1(t_0)&y_2(t_0)\ y'_1(t_0)&y'_2(t_0)\end{array}\right\vert \neq 0$ (2.3)

The set of even/odd solutions:

$\displaystyle \left.\begin{array}{l}y_1:  y(t_0)=1,   y'(t_0)=0\ y_2:  y(t...
...}\right\}   W(Y)=\left\vert\begin{array}{cc}1&0\ 0&1\end{array}\right\vert=1$

Are thus fundamental sets of solutions. We may follow Floquet's theorem [3], which tells us that Mathieu's equation has at least one solution $ \ni$

$\displaystyle y(z):(y(z+\pi)=\sigma y(z))    $   Floquet's Theorem (2.4)

The proof of this is outlined as follows.

Since Mathieu's equations will have an even ($ w_1(\eta)$ ) and odd ($ w_2(\eta)$ ) solution pair, these two functions may define any other solution, e.g. consider

$\displaystyle w_1(\eta+\pi)=\alpha w_1(\eta)+ \beta w_2(\eta)  \rightarrow  w'_1(\eta+\pi)=\alpha w'_1(\eta)+ \beta w'_2(\eta) \ni$

$\displaystyle w_1(0)=w'_2(0)=1,  w_1'(0)=w_2(0)=0  \Rightarrow w_1(\pi)=\alpha,  w'_1(\pi)=\beta \ni$

$\displaystyle w_1(\eta+\pi)=w_1(\pi)w_1(\eta)+w'_1(\pi)w_2(\eta),  $   as well,$\displaystyle  w_2(\eta+\pi)=w_2(\pi)w_1(\eta)+w_2'(\pi)w_2(\eta)$

Let

$\displaystyle A = \left(\begin{array}{cc}w_1(\pi)&w'_1(\pi)\ w_2(\pi)&w'_2(\pi...
...\begin{array}{c}w_1(\eta)\ w_2(\eta)\end{array}\right)\ni Aw(\eta)=w(\eta+\pi)$

According to Floquet's theorem, we thus require,

$\displaystyle \left\vert A - \sigma I\right\vert = 0$

an eigenvalue equation which can be satisfied with the proper value of $ \sigma$ . We consider further that Mathieu's equation has a solution of the form $ e^{\mu \eta}\phi(\eta)$

$\displaystyle \sigma=e^{\mu \pi},  \phi(\eta)=e^{-\mu \eta}y(\eta) \ni \phi(\eta + \pi) = e^{-\mu(\eta+\pi)}y(\eta+\pi)=e^{-\mu \eta}y(\eta)=\phi(\eta)$


next up previous
Next: Hill's Method solution Up: Mathieu's Equation, solution, and Previous: Mathieu's Equation, solution, and
tim jones 2008-07-07