Bug: bea/5fb
ID : | 5fb11e65-68a0-4015-b404-737238299cdc |
Short name : | bea/5fb |
Status : | open |
Severity : | minor |
Assigned : | |
Reporter : | W. Trevor King <wking@drexel.edu> |
Creator : | W. Trevor King <wking@drexel.edu> |
Created : | Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:08:40 +0000 |
Summary : | Add change hooks to Storage class |
Comment: |
--------- Comment --------- ID: 628a050a-f969-4290-8468-f5e991528f40 Short name: bea/5fb/628 From: W. Trevor King <wking@drexel.edu> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:04:49 +0000 Either of these could be added at the libbe.command.base.Command.run level. The Git hooks would be 'pre-<command-name>' and 'post-<command-name>'. Oh, and the hooks are therefore command-level hooks, not storage-level hooks. We still want storage-level hooks for notification emails, etc, and they would definately have to follow the Git directory approach. Hmm. Storage level hooks will be awkward... |
Comment: |
--------- Comment --------- ID: 89d53fa4-635d-4562-adaa-cd04b6c80fcf Short name: bea/5fb/89d From: "W. Trevor King" <wking@drexel.edu> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 02:05:09 +0000 > We still want storage-level hooks for notification emails, etc, The new `be serve --notify ...` is effectively a command-specific storage-level hook (for storage actions that change the repository). If it seems to be working out well, we can move the logic down into the base storage classes. |
ID: f3e90a7e-b8c4-4a7c-8609-6a783ae59762
Short name: bea/5fb/f3e
From: W. Trevor King <wking@drexel.edu>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:17:10 +0000