All the stuff that is far, far away...


Some of the most impressive objects to image (in my opinion) are those that are the farthest from us. I'm talking about Galaxies. They come in all shapes and sizes and colors and range from the relatively close (M31) to those on the edge of the universe (those in the Hubble deep field). Most of those that I took pictures of were of the relatively close variety, as I would not be able to image ones that were too distant (and thus, dimmer).

First, M33, which is a lovely galaxy, and stands out the instant you find it (readily visible in only a 10 second exposure, though this one is 60 seconds in length).

Note: all of these images have been resampled, and contrast adjusted to bring out the most detail
M33 - standard scaling
M33, 60 sec: Taken 3.11.2000 at Goodsell Observatory through an LX200 at f/6.3

Here is another version of the above picture, except the contrast was scaled logarithmically. You decide which one is better...
M33 - logrithmic contrast scaling
M33, 60 sec: Taken 3.11.2000 at Goodsell Observatory through an LX200 at f/6.3



My personal favorite though, is the Andromeda galaxy, M31 in the constellation Andromeda (funny that). It is the farthest object from earth that you can see with the naked eye, and with a decent pair of binocular begins to show its true size (it covers over 2 full degrees on the sky: more than a full moon!). This image only shows a small section of it, but you can see some of the dust lanes in the upper right region of the image. The bright spot in the center is the galactic nucleus, and, as this is a logrithmically scalled image, not as bright or large as it otherwise would be.
M31 - The Andromeda Galaxy
M31, 40 sec: Taken 3.11.2000 at Goodsell Observatory through an LX200 at f/6.3

One of my goals for this term (that I set this summer, not knowing what I was getting into), was to get a set of pictures of all of Andromeda by the end of the term, preferably in color. This was a larger undertaking that I thought it would be, and I was not able to complete it. However, I did learn many things about taking color images and long exposures, which will help me in the future (next time there is a good clear night, I intend to try again). Taking good images of galaxies takes a long time: 40seconds to 3 minutes or more for one exposure (often taken in sections to reduce bluring and movement artifacts from inaccuracies in the telescope's drive). That's a lot more than the .01 seconds for a decent exposure of Jupiter!


Dim Galaxies

One of the first other galaxies I went looking for was one that Voyager said should be near Mirach, a bright star in Andromeda. I decided, since I would be using Mirach as the starting point for my search for the asteroid 2000 UG11 on 3 November, I might as well see if I could find the galaxy near it. Sure enough, there is something non-stellar (i.e. not point-like) to the upper right of Mirach (that completely washed-out, over-exposed and big thing on the bottom-middle). This was a 10second exposure, because I was afraid if I took anything more than that I would completely lose the galaxy to Mirach's over-exposure, but if it was less I wouldn't be able to find the galaxy. I think I could have safely increased the exposure, though I am not sure by how much.

This had the contrast scaled logarythmically, to bring out the galaxy. Using a log scale on the contrast is a way to bring out dim objects, but loses some of the detail.
NGC404 near Mirach
NGC404 10 sec: Taken 3.11.2000 at Goodsell Observatory through an LX200 at f/6.3


Some other galaxies I imaged were taken while attempting to find the asteroid 2000 UG11. That story is on another page, but I've placed the pictures I took on this one, because this is where they make more sense. The descriptions of my route to UG11 fit with the order that I have listed these images.

NGC672 was the first one after NGC404. After I took the picture, I saw there was another galaxy there as well! It turns out that NGC684 was also in the field of view of this, and I wasn't even expecting it! Both are spiral galaxies with respective magnitudes of 11.3 and 13.2.
NGC672 and NGC684
NGC684, 40 sec: Taken 3.11.2000 at Goodsell Observatory through an LX200 at f/6.3



Next were NGC777 and NGC778. These are two spiral galaxies at 12.3 and 14.2 magnitude respectively. NGC777 is slightly above and right of center, while NGC778 is below and right of center (and quite dim, though it looks less like a star than NGC777). The contrast here was once again scaled logarithmically, to make them both more visible in a typical browser.
NGC777 and NGC778
NGC777, 40 sec: Taken 3.11.2000 at Goodsell Observatory through an LX200 at f/6.3



Now came NGC925, which is another spiral at 10.2 magnitude. You can possibly a barred spiral structure in this set of three combined 40 second images (which I would like to investigate in more detail in the future).
NGC925
NGC925, 3x 40 sec: Taken 3.11.2000 at Goodsell Observatory through an LX200 at f/6.3


NGC972 was near the end of this journey. It is a spiral galaxy at magnitude 12.3. This image came from overlaying three 40 second images, which helps bring out detail.
NGC972
NGC972, 3x 40 sec: Taken 3.11.2000 at Goodsell Observatory through an LX200 at f/6.3



Finally we have NGC1156, at magnitude 12.1. Once I had found this one, I knew I was close to my final destination of 2000 UG11...
NGC1156
NGC1156, 40 sec: Taken 3.11.2000 at Goodsell Observatory through an LX200 at f/6.3


Return to John's Astronomy page
Return to Goodsell Special project page
Return to Goodsell main page
John Parejko
Last modified: Mon Feb 5 23:05:37 CST 2001